V: What a 1983 Miniseries Can Teach Us About Fighting Fascism – Part Two

Part Two of V features humanity fighting back against the nefarious Visitors, and a protagonist who serves as a model for inspiring leadership.

On another expedition to a Visitor mothership to snoop around and gather information, journalist Mike Donovan makes contact with Martin, a Visitor fifth columnist sympathetic to the humans’ plight. He learns that, on the orders of the mysterious and unseen Visitor Leader, the aliens’ goals are to steal Earth’s water and use its population for food.

Donovan: “How’d someone like that get to be your leader, anyway?”

Martin: “Charisma, circumstances, promises. Not enough of us spoke out to question him until it was too late. It happens on your planet, doesn’t it?”

With this subtle nod to V’s inspiration, the Sinclair Lewis novel It Can’t Happen Here, V continues its allegory on fascism so skillfully established in Part One. Just as humanity is now under the thumb of an oppressive regime, so the Visitors themselves are captives to tyranny.

So how do you start to fight back? Part Two provides the answer.

As I write, the occupation of a major American city by armed, masked federal agents appears to be winding down. Peaceful protests and a national backlash against the murders of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti by ICE has taken the wind out of the sails of the Trump regime, at least somewhat. Resistance works. But the regime is still there, and it will keep trying to take more and more freedoms until people push back forcefully enough. So it is with humanity and the Visitors, as our scrappy resistance cell wins its first meaningful victory.

With its theme of resistance, Part Two is more action-packed than Part One, though it has its share of powerful dramatic moments. As before, the narrative largely centers around Donovan and Julie Parrish, former biochemist turned rebel leader. Donovan gets to charge boldly around doing the action hero thing, while Julie begins the hard work of organizing her resistance cell and projecting a confidence she may not feel.

When the two protagonists finally meet, it leads to some interesting scenes where they suss each other out. Donovan wonders: does this kid have the guts to be a real leader? Julie assesses: is this guy really on our side? But the two develop a satisfying mutual respect for each other’s abilities and methods. Donovan recognizes that Julie has an innate strength and a talent for inspiring people, and Julie sees that Donovan does have humanity’s best interests at heart. So when Julie develops a plan to evacuate the resistance’s mountain camp, she’s happy to let Donovan be the lone wolf, sneaking off on his own mission back to the mothership. It’s the healthy, harmonious version of the dynamic between Admiral Holdo and Poe Dameron in The Last Jedi: the strong female commander and the loose cannon male rogue working together.

Two protagonists showing mutual respect. (Left) Marc Singer as Mike Donovan. (Right) Faye Grant as Julie Parrish.

Julie has the most compelling emotional journey of the miniseries: a normal person who’s forced by circumstance to become extraordinary, and along the way, discovers an inner strength she didn’t know she had. She’s not mean or aggressive or physically strong (she walks with a cane due to a laser gun wound from Part One), but she becomes the resistance leader simply because she’s a firm, calm, reassuring presence who people naturally look up to. Several times, we see her propose an idea, only for the group to look at her expectantly, and her internal struggle as she realizes, “Well, guess it’s got to be me.”

Actress Faye Grant and writer/director Kenneth Johnson sketch a relatable, admirable character who’s easy to root for. In a vulnerable moment with her friend Ruby, Julie confesses:

Julie: “They all look at me like I know what to do…”
Ruby: “And you’re just as lost and scared as we are.”

It’s the essence of leadership.

Another major storyline involves Robert Maxwell, a paleontologist who fled with his family from the Visitor regime in Part One and sought refuge with the Bernsteins. In Part Two, Robert moves his family to the apparent safety of the resistance camps. But when his teenage daughter Robin is abducted by the Visitors and Robert ventures forth to find her, he’s caught and given an agonizing choice: give away the location of the resistance’s mountain camp, where the rest of his family is waiting, or keep quiet and sacrifice Robin.

Michael Durrell as Robert Maxwell.

He sells out the resistance, in exchange for a promise from the Visitor commander to hold their attack until a certain time, so Robert has a chance to get his family out.

Of course, the Visitors betray him. They attack the camp early, and his wife is killed.

In the play adaptation of It Can’t Happen Here, America’s business titans make deals with the new dictator, Buzz Windrip, figuring that if they cozy up to power, they could get some sweet tax breaks or other preferential treatment, exactly the same way that companies today from Apple to CBS are cozying up to Trump so that he’ll approve their corporate mergers. But to the businessmen’s horror, they discover too late that Windrip respects no authority but his own. “I am America!” he declares, and has a major industrialist thrown out of the White House.

The lesson from both V and It Can’t Happen Here: you don’t make deals with these people. Whether it’s a gang of sentient lizards trying to steal your planet’s water or a real estate tycoon trying to seize Greenland, the principle is the same: no will matters but their will to power. And they will turn against you on a dime. I suspect that many a business leader and celebrity will regret their association with Trump when he’s out of power, and we shouldn’t let them forget it.

Robert learns this lesson the hard way, and V pushes the consequences as far as 80s network television could allow, as Robert picks up a gun to shoot himself, only to see at the last moment that his daughters survived the assault. Still, he will have to live with himself, and one flaw of the series going forward is that the story never deals with the emotional fallout of his actions.

Like Part One, there’s a lot going on, making an easy summary difficult. Some other notable moments:

  • The series takes its biggest dive into 80s schlockiness when a sexy Visitor rebel named Barbara charges in and insists that Donovan change into her uniform. We’re in so much danger, you see, we must take our clothes off! Gotta get those sexy screenshots for the ads!
A sexy screenshot. Jenny Neumann as Barbara.
  • Visitor leader Diana orders a handsome young Visitor soldier to abuse the protective relationship he’s established with Robin to impregnate her as a “medical experiment.” Just in case you forgot these guys are evil.
  • Elias, motivated by the death of his brother Ben in Part One, becomes a full-throated resistance member. It’s satisfying to see him join the fray, and the series does a good job for its time showing people of all races, ages, and genders coming together to fight the Visitors.
  • Sancho, the Maxwell family’s Mexican-American gardener, goes through one of the miniseries’ most unexpected and epic journeys, as he smuggles the Maxwells through a checkpoint in the back of his pickup truck, gets abducted and tortured by the Visitors, gets rescued by Donovan, and, in a delightful twist, takes control of the laser cannons of Donovan’s shuttle to shoot down Visitor baddies. It’s a straight ripoff / homage of the Millenium Falcon / TIE Fighter shootout from the original Star Wars, and it’s just a wonderful touch to see a Mexican-American gardener play the space hero role a la Luke Skywalker or Han Solo.
Rafael Campos as Sancho Gomez.

But ultimately, we come back to Julie. As the Visitors pummel the mountain camp, Julie freezes in shock and horror, watching the carnage. Buildings on fire. People getting shot. Is this the moment when she’ll crack? But once again, she finds her courage. She rushes out into the crossfire to help some injured comrades, plants her feet, and faces off against a strafing shuttle with nothing but a pistol. It’s a precise visual echo of the scene from Part One with the Salvadoran leader, marking the moment when Julie truly becomes a resistance fighter. The lone rebel standing tall and brave against the overwhelming force of the enemy: it’s the signature image of V and its thematic message in a nutshell. Be Julie: the regular person who finds the courage to stand up to evil.

The situation we face with the Trump regime today is not that extreme. ICE may be a paramilitary menace, but it doesn’t control the country the way the Visitors control the world. Peaceful protest has been enough, and hopefully it will continue to be. But like a lot of great art, V exaggerates to convey an essential truth. Being a Julie may not mean literally picking up a pistol. But it may mean being a Renee Nicole Good or an Alex Pretti: someone who puts their safety on the line to protect their neighbors.

Today, we don’t have a leader like MLK or Gandhi to rally around, someone who has an untarnished reputation and moral authority with a critical mass of people. Perhaps it’s impossible for such a figure to arise in our chaotic social media age, where the most popular platforms encourage snark, hot takes, and pithy takedowns rather than soaring, universal rhetoric. But perhaps this time, we don’t need one. Perhaps what we need are a million Julies, calm but firm, organizing behind the scenes.

Somehow, I have a feeling that the Julies will win.

V: What a 1983 Miniseries Can Teach Us About Fighting Fascism – Part One

V is a masterwork of science fiction allegory that can inspire us on how to resist the Trump regime.

A government aggressively undermining trust in scientists, journalists, and academics. Propaganda that pushes state-approved ideology with figureheads who spout the party line. Masked men marching in the streets, abducting and shooting people at will.

This is the world of the superb 1983 miniseries V. It is also America under Donald Trump in 2026.

Yes, it’s fascism. Masked federal agents are shooting unarmed American citizens in the streets. That’s about as fascist as it gets. No, we are not helpless against it, and we certainly haven’t fallen as far as the people of Earth have in V.

I’ve thought of V frequently over the past year. My parents saw the miniseries when it came out, and showed it to me later when it was released on DVD. I was in middle school, at a ripe, impressionable age when I was starting to reckon with adult storytelling. V made a deep impression on me, not just for its exciting sci-fi action and the impressive scope of its narrative, but for its message, embodied in the opening dedication:

To the heroism of the Resistance Fighters – past, present, and future – this work is respectfully dedicated

Originally envisioned by writer/director Kenneth Johnson as an adaptation of Sinclair Lewis’ anti-fascist novel It Can’t Happen Here, V follows in the best sci-fi tradition of telling an urgent political and social allegory cloaked in genre trappings. Laser guns, aliens, and spaceships are the window dressing for timeless themes of tyranny and resistance. In fact, the sci-fi angle probably helped the story travel farther and reach a wider audience than a straightforward adaptation would have.

During both of Donald Trump’s terms, V and George Orwell’s 1984 prepared me well for the warning signs of fascism: the “alternative facts,” the cultlike worship of the Great Leader, the constant gaslighting to force you to, as Orwell put it, “reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.” (The Trump regime’s attempt to recast the January 6th insurrection as a peaceable assembly may be the most notorious example.) Aside from a few bad matte shots, V holds up brilliantly. Its storytelling is as gripping and powerful as ever. What can it teach us today about how to recognize and fight back against Trump and MAGA?

We open in El Salvador, as freelance journalist Mike Donovan and his assistant Tony document a civil war. Explosions boom, gunshots ping, and helicopters zoom overhead as a revolutionary insists that he’ll keep on fighting until his country is free. There’s the theme, right there in the opening seconds: resistance against tyranny. Donovan films the freedom fighter bravely planting his feet and facing off against a strafing helicopter armed with nothing but a pistol. Remember this image: we’ll come back to it in Part Two.

After Donovan and Tony escape from the war zone, Donovan turns to see – whoa! An alien spacecraft covering half the sky, the first of many strikingly cinematic moments throughout the two-part miniseries.

The next half-hour is a masterclass in tight, efficient storytelling, as we’re introduced to more than 20 named characters, while still following the single narrative thread of the mysterious alien Visitors. After parking their flying saucers over most major cities on Earth, the Visitors make peaceful contact with humanity. They look just like us, with only their electronically modulated voices signaling their extraterrestrial origins. They insist that they’re here just so humanity can help them manufacture certain chemicals they need to run their society. In return, they’ll vastly accelerate our technological development.

The deal is too good to be true, as brilliantly suggested by subtle cues. At a digsite where paleontologists uncover remains of ancient hominins, the scientists watch in wonder as a Visitor spacecraft flies overhead. An ominous shot juxtaposes an ancient skull with the alien vessel, suggesting that these newcomers mean death.

The action generally follows two protagonists: Donovan, as his attempts to investigate the aliens get him branded as a fugitive, and biochemist Julie Parrish, who gradually begins to organize a resistance movement to oppose the Visitor regime. But the brilliance of V is how effectively our sympathies are spread among many characters, established with quick, concise, human moments. The plot defies easy summary. We follow Donovan and Julie, but also several interconnected households of ordinary people in Los Angeles, who show us a spectrum of varied reactions to the onset of fascism:

  • Donovan’s mother Eleanor immediately insists that her husband lobby for the Visitors to use his chemical plant. We later see her shamelessly flirt with a Visitor officer. For the scheming Eleanor, ideology doesn’t matter, only proximity to power.

    Her mercenary zeal for cozying up to the regime is reminiscent of America’s tech elite: Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, and others who obsequiously crowd in the background for group photos of themselves with the Great Leader, in hopes of currying favor for themselves and their companies.
  • Donovan’s newscaster colleague and old flame Christine Walsh is recruited by the Visitors to serve as their official spokesperson. (One could also say seduced – a scene between Christine and Visitor leader Diana has strong sexual undertones.) She’s enthusiastic about the job as an “excellent career move,” and when Donovan warns that she may be compromising her objectivity, she brushes off his concerns: “It’s the perfect opportunity to get really inside stuff, exclusive stuff… I’m sure to get a book out of it at the very least.”

    Why work for a fascist president? Perhaps because you believe you can control him, use the position as a career stepping-stone, and escape with your objectivity intact, and maybe a book deal to boot. Scores of former Trump staffers such as John Bolton, Cassidy Hutchinson, Kellyanne Conway, Mark Meadows, and more did indeed get their book deals… and the books flopped.
  • Daniel Bernstein, a troubled teen boy with a drinking problem who can’t hold down a job, finds meaning by joining the Friends of the Visitors, a youth auxiliary movement with clear parallels to the Hitler Youth. His journey towards becoming a full fascist foot soldier is reminiscent of the ways that young men today are drawn toward the manosphere and vile figures like Nick Fuentes and Andrew Tate. A movement that promises meaning and direction and whispers in your ear that you have the natural right to dominate others: it’s catnip to insecure and resentful young men.
  • Daniel’s grandfather Abraham is a Holocaust survivor who, with every step the Visitors take toward total control, sees more clearly the beginnings of tyranny. Leonardo Cimino is perfectly cast, conveying Abraham’s entire thought process with subtle, wordless shifts of expression. Every time the film cuts to Abraham reacting to another Visitor announcement, you can see that this man knows exactly what’s going on.
Leonardo Cimino as Abraham Bernstein

The first signs of trouble arrive when the Visitors begin secretly abducting and murdering scientists. In public announcements, they allege the discovery of a “scientist conspiracy,” primarily of anthropologists and biochemists, whose members allegedly sought to seize Visitor motherships. The first step for any fascist regime is to attack sources of independent knowledge production: scientists, journalists, academics, so that the only acceptable truth is the one produced by the state or the Leader. Hence Trump’s relentless attacks for over a decade now on the media, which he has dubbed “the enemy of the people.” In his second term, Trump has also accelerated his assault on research institutions like the Ivy League schools and the University of California, threatening to withhold funds unless they cave to his ideological demands.

The main reason the Visitors target scientists, of course, is that they’re the ones capable of figuring out the truth. The truth that Donovan uncovers while snooping around on a mothership…

They’re lizard people!!

The reveal of Diana and her associate Steven eating guinea pigs and mice is memorably creepy, and the scene where Donovan literally rips the mask off a Visitor to reveal a lizard face still gives me a jolt. It’s thematically appropriate: rip the proverbial mask off a fascist and you’ll find the ugliness inside. But also, it’s just plain cool: a visceral creature-feature shock.

By now, the telltale signs of tyranny are accelerating. The propaganda posters go up. Mass resentment of scientists begins to fester. Fascism requires an “Other” to rally against: a class of people deemed depraved, dirty, evil, even subhuman. Not “one of us.” In V, scientists become the Other, as we see a gang of thugs throw rocks through the window of a paleontologist’s house. In Trump’s regime, immigrants are the Other, as we see J.D. Vance and other Christian Nationalists create new categories of people such as “Heritage Americans” for the purpose of identifying who “we” are and who we are permitted to discriminate against.

And then the armed, masked men start patrolling the streets. Do I even need to spell out the modern-day parallels here?

Though this alien invasion provides the setup, and the film includes many playful references to sci-fi pop culture (a marching band plays the Star Wars theme, two characters play Space Invaders on Atari), for most of Part One, the sci-fi elements fade into the background and we mostly focus on ordinary people in scenes that could refer to any real-life authoritarian regime. Daniel’s parents begin to walk on eggshells around him, no longer certain that he wouldn’t inform on them. Julie, as she sees her scientist colleagues disappear one by one, organizes a resistance meeting. Though it was easier to get off the grid in 1983, the same principle applies today: resistance begins locally, with groups of people building support networks for their own communities. We’ve seen this demonstrated in Minneapolis and Chicago, where local citizens band together to obstruct ICE and warn neighbors of raids.

(Left) The first resistance meeting. (Right) Faye Grant as Julie Parrish.

Part One ends with two gripping dramatic moments. Abraham agrees to shelter a paleontologist, his wife, and three kids in his backyard poolhouse. When his son expresses reservations, Abraham responds with a powerful speech, revealing that “your mother didn’t have a heart attack in the boxcar;” she died in the Nazi gas chambers.

“Perhaps if somebody had given us a place to hide… Don’t you see, Stanley, they have to stay, or else we haven’t learned a thing.”

On the nose? Yes, but it should be. Abraham reminds us of the consequences of demonizing the Other, and the failure to help those in need.

The second moment follows the first resistance action of Julie’s cell. During a raid for medical equipment, Julie’s colleague Ben is mortally wounded by Visitor gunfire. She drives Ben, who’s fading fast, to see his brother Elias one last time. We’ve already seen the strained relationship between the brothers: Ben, the golden boy, the doctor (Elias calls him an “Uncle Tom”), and Elias, the common thief, the street hustler (Ben tells him to “drop the Richard Pryor act”).

As Ben quietly slips away, Michael Wright delivers a heart-wrenching performance. He’s in denial, talking and pacing around frantically, anything to fill the air, anything to distract himself from the awful truth of his dead brother before him. A boombox incongruously pumps out cheerful funk music. But eventually, the truth can’t be denied and Elias breaks right before our eyes. “The doctor cannot die. The other one can die, but…” It’s an acting tour de force that should’ve won an award. And it demonstrates to us another awful truth: Elias thought he could carry on with his life, making money in his side hustles. But under a tyrannical regime, death and sorrow come to you.

(Left) Richard Lawson as Dr. Ben Taylor. (Right) Michael Wright as Elias Taylor.

Part One of V is mostly about the rise of fascism. But in Part Two, we’ll explore the next step: resistance to fascism. The final scene of Part One points the way forward. Abraham catches a group of kids spray-painting some Visitor propaganda posters. He shows them a new emblem to paint: the letter V, for Victory. It’s right there in the title. In the long run, tyranny always loses. As long as we resist, we will have victory.

Movie Memories #3: The Lion King

The 1994 animated powerhouse is still vibrant, devastating, and masterful today.

The last time I watched The Lion King, the world was falling apart.

It was April 2020, a few weeks into Covid. Colorado was under a stay-at-home order, so I was filling my days by lying on the couch tapping away at my remote marketing job, then diving into a swirl of media every night. It was increasingly clear that we were all going to be stuck at home for weeks, months, maybe years.

Years prior, I’d started a marathon of all the Disney animated features. In the Time Before Streaming, it was difficult to track them down. But during Covid, since Disney Plus had just come out, they were all available at a click of a button. The Disney marathon, one movie per night, became my first of many Covid projects, an anchor in a chaotic, convulsing world.

The first time I wore a mask to the grocery store.

On April 7th, I ventured out for a “social distancing dinner” with friends Alex and Zack, the first time we’d seen each other in weeks. While driving west on C-470 into a dazzling sunset, I consciously fixed the moment in my memory, knowing that I would never again see the roads this empty. The postapocalyptic stillness could’ve been eerie, except for some reason, I felt buoyant and alive. The parking lot of Red Robin was dotted with chairs spaced widely apart, with hastily printed signs taped to them: “Takeout Booth #7,” “Takeout Booth #8.” Cars pulled up to their assigned booths, skittish restaurant employees wearing bandannas over their faces trotted out with bags of takeout, and cars sped away.

I sat in a chair outside Alex and Zack’s car and we chatted through their open window. Eventually, everyone felt silly with that arrangement, so they just invited me into their car, as long as I sat in the backseat with windows open. They were feeling somber, so I tried to lighten the mood by gushing about my Disney marathon, how it was giving me a newfound appreciation for musicals. After dinner, I drove east, straight into the rising full moon, and couldn’t believe how energetic I felt. The very stillness of our pandemic-ridden world seemed to be filling me with potential energy. When we get out of this, I thought, I’m ready for an adventure. I went home to The Lion King.

The Lion King has held a special place in my heart for over 30 years. Aside from Fantasia, it’s easily my favorite Disney film. To me, it’s the ur-movie, the movie from which all other movies spring. Whenever I put together a movie marathon as a kid, it was always the first. When I was 15 and spent every night of summer break watching a movie, I kicked it off with The Lion King. Thus it ever was, and thus it ever shall be. The movie has a deep, archetypal, even spiritual power, plus charming comedy and kickass songs to boot.

I mean, what millenial’s blood is not awakened by the very first note?

NAAAAAAAAAA

In a college directing class, we each put together “autodramas:” the stories of our lives, told only through action and music. The beginning of my autodrama was me lying on the floor asleep, then being startled awake by the opening cry of “Circle of Life,” summoned forth into full awareness as a human being.

In 1994, the Disney renaissance had blossomed into full flower. After a series of flops in the 80s, Disney animated movies had been revived by a fresh infusion of talent and an embrace of Broadway musical storytelling techniques. Coming on the heels of powerhouses The Little MermaidBeauty and the Beast, and AladdinThe Lion King was the apotheosis of Disney’s new, wildly successful creative phase. I got to hear Brenda Chapman, Head of Story on The Lion King, speak at the 2020 Austin Film Festival, and this is how she explained the film’s success:

“After Beauty and the Beast, I threw my name in the hat for Head of Story. There was a Swan Lake project that got canceled when Disney found out that another studio was doing Swan Princess. So I thought my chance was gone. I had no desire to work on the development hell project King of the Jungle, which turned into The Lion KingPocahontas was the A-movie that everyone wanted to work on. The Lion King was the B-movie. But because of that, Lion King had a lot of young, green artists who were hungry for success.”

After she reluctantly took the assignment, Chapman “did a lot of writing on the movie.” Her big sequence was Mufasa’s ghost, and she wrote his words of wisdom: “Remember who you are.”

Chapman continued, “The Lion King was so successful that it shifted Disney’s mindset to money and merchandising. Execs and marketers started dictating the story, rather than the artists. It became more corporate.”

That passion vibrates through the movie, the passion of an underdog creative team doing its best work. It’s evident in the visuals, which were Disney’s most sumptuous up to that point. Having seen the animated films’ visual progression in my marathon, I found the increase in technical quality from the 70s and 80s films astounding. Check out “I Just Can’t Wait to Be King,” my dark horse favorite song, and its psychedelic, kaleidoscopic feast for the eyes.

It’s evident in the stellar voice cast. I will forever lament the trend in animated films toward casting celebrity actors rather than voice actors. Some actors may have charisma, but they don’t necessarily have interesting voices. James Earl Jones and Jeremy Irons have voices: growling, rich, melodic, flowing tones that test the low registers of my subwoofer. Their turns as Mufasa and Scar respectively bring the raw power and dramatic flair of theatre to a story that demands it.

It’s evident in that original story. The Lion King was Disney’s first major animated film not based on a preexisting fairytale. It takes elements of Hamlet, plus Moses and Joseph from the Bible, and applies them to a hero’s journey narrative to dazzling success.

The movie just works. Many movies have comic relief characters that are supposed to be funny (Oliver and Company has about five); in this movie, they’re actually funny. Many movies try to tug on your heartstrings with major character deaths; this movie destroys you. Many movies try to get you to swoon over forced romances; this movie has one of the most beautiful and romantic scenes of all time, and it’s two animated lions!

In the scene where the villainous Scar lures our hero Simba and his father Mufasa into a gorge, then sets loose a herd of wildebeest to trample them, every shot selection, every edit, every story beat is chosen to make the action as intense and emotionally direct as possible. It’s loud, it’s scary, it’s overwhelming, it’s unsafe. As Chapman’s comments underline, this is what corporate, marketing-directed storytelling can never give you: a moment as horrifying and visceral as the twin shots of Mufasa falling into the stampede and the rapid zoom-out from a screaming Simba.

Or the utterly devastating image of Simba curling up beside his father’s body, seeking Mufasa’s strength and comfort even in death.

Why is this movie so beloved by multiple generations? And why has Disney, despite making many good-to-great films since, never quite reached this level again? Because it’s unsafe. Because it makes you feel.

The same goes for the “Can You Feel the Love Tonight” sequence that illustrates the budding romance between Simba and Nala. Lush, colorful visuals and a warm, dreamy soundscape all enhance the emotion between the characters, which is depicted in the clear, direct way that only animation can pull off. It’s difficult to get real actors to create genuine chemistry. But in animation, you can draw it, and if done well, it strikes right to the heart.

There was once a silly myth that in one scene, Simba flops down in the dust and the cloud spells the word “sex.” I have no idea why people freaked out over that when this legitimately spicy moment is right there on screen:

Though Simba is tempted by Timon and Pumbaa’s philosophy of “Hakuna Matata,” i.e. let go of your worries and turn your back on the world, with a nudge from Nala and a powerful vision of Mufasa’s ghost, Simba is convinced to return to Pride Rock and take his kingdom back from Scar. The movie has several strong thematic messages. One of them, of course, is embodied in the song “Circle of Life” and Mufasa’s speech to Simba about how the balance of nature must be respected. But the one that stuck with me the most was Simba’s key decision to return home and confront his past.

As the pandemic wore on throughout 2020, a craving suffused me: a need to get out, have experiences and adventures, and feel connected to the world. And so, on a walk through a bitter, icy suburban neighborhood in December, with the first people starting to get their vaccines and the end of the pandemic distantly glimmering, I realized what I had to do next.

I had to confront my past. And by doing so, forge my future.

I mainly grew up in Highlands Ranch, Colorado. It was my place of Hakuna Matata, my sanctuary, my refuge from cares. When I left Colorado for film school in Los Angeles, those were some of the hardest years of my life: personally, financially, psychologically. I purposefully held LA at arm’s length; I didn’t want it to feel like home. I bounced between Highlands Ranch and LA no less than five times. And these were full-fledged, “pack-everything-in-the-car” moves. I kept returning to LA because I knew it was my future, the place that would help me grow, and kept returning to Colorado because I couldn’t let go of the comforts of home.

And beyond that, there was Washington state, the place where I’d spent the majority of my childhood and the place I always wanted to return someday. I’d been on the verge of moving to Seattle before the pandemic hit.

So there was my plan. I’d go back to LA and do it right this time, with a steady job, good roommates, and open-minded attitude. I’d actually treat it like home and wash away the bad memories with good ones. And then I’d go to Seattle and do whatever my soul needed to do there. My escape into Hakuna Matata was over. It was time to confront Scar.

I did move to LA, then to Seattle. I took trips, had adventures. And eventually, my travels took me to a place I’d wanted to revisit for 20 years: Pride Rock.

At least, my own personal Pride Rock. Its real name is Frenchman Coulee, a recreation area midway between Seattle and Spokane. We used to stop there on road trips from where we lived in Spokane to visit family in Seattle: a convenient place for restless kids to stretch their legs. My sister Laura and I, inspired by The Lion King, dubbed one rock slab Pride Rock and took a picture there. On another road trip 10 years later, we took another picture; by then, my youngest sister Kayla had joined the family.

For 20 years, I’d dreamed about finding the place again. And I did. Pride Rock was now hidden behind sagebrush, but it was still there.

(Left) Me and Laura, 1995. (Center) Laura, Kayla, and me, 2005. (Right) Just me, 2024.

It’s a fine thing to stand in the same spot where you stood as a child, to feel connected to your past. But what I really noticed this time was the view from Pride Rock: the wild, empty, and beautiful Columbia River Gorge.

It’s a fine thing to remember watching one of your favorite childhood movies, feeling awed, overwhelmed, and deeply moved. And then you look forward, and realize that somewhere along the way, you got a job, a car, the freedom to travel, ambition, and spirit. You see the continuum of your life expressed through a movie over 30 years. You stand on Pride Rock looking outward and realize that everything the light touches is your kingdom.

Movie Memories #2: MacGyver – Lost Treasure of Atlantis

A 1994 TV movie starring my favorite mulleted secret agent is both a solid adventure yarn and a refreshing dose of 90s optimism.

We’d all like to imagine that if we were trapped in a tough situation, say a cave-in or at the bottom of the ocean on a nuclear submarine, we could escape using solely our wits, a pile of household items, and a Swiss Army knife. Such is the appeal of MacGyver (1985-1992), which I will forever remember as a Dad show.

Over seven seasons and 139 episodes, Richard Dean Anderson portrays mulleted secret agent MacGyver, a family-friendly version of James Bond who refuses to handle firearms and instead gets out of tough jams using jerry-rigged contraptions and his knowledge of chemistry, engineering, and hard science. My Dad, along with 80s and 90s Dads everywhere, was a loyal fan of the show. When Mac pulled off one of his trademark engineering feats, Dad called it a “trick,” and gauged the quality of the episode by how many great “tricks” it had. The earlier seasons were better, he said, because they had 5-6 tricks per episode, but then the writers got tired in the later seasons and trick frequency dropped to 2-3 per episode.

To me as a kid, my Dad just was MacGyver. He even had a Swiss Army knife that could do all the Dad stuff anyone could need: opening packages, removing splinters with tweezers. He taught me the most whiz-bang 90s technical skills: how to navigate MS-DOS, how to handle a CD so you don’t scratch the shiny part, how to program a VCR. He was the Dad who, when I got a cool new video game that required Windows 95, stayed up all night to insert and eject the 25 installation CDs to upgrade our computer from MS-DOS to Windows 95 to get the game running. He could do anything.

Dad and I, circa 1991.

On May 14, 1994, he taped the first of MacGyver’s two TV movies, Lost Treasure of Atlantis, on VHS on its first-run presentation. My sister Laura and I watched the tape ad nauseam. It became my first adventure story, and Mac was one of the first movie heroes I looked up to.

In the movie, MacGyver and his old college professor Atticus search for the lost treasure of Atlantis. It’s clearly derived from Indiana Jones, with several explicit nods to Raiders of the Lost Ark:

  • One MacGuffin is an ancient treasure box called the Ark of Solon, much like the Ark of the Covenant.
  • In the opening scene when MacGyver and Atticus attempt to retrieve an Atlantean coin, Mac replaces the coin with a lens cap, just like Indy replaces the golden idol with a sandbag. It goes about as well for both characters.
  • The Indy references are no surprise, since the episode “Eye of Osiris,” done by the same writer-director team, directly rips off Raiders’ Nepal bar scene.

But the movie puts enough of a fresh spin on the adventure plot, especially the engaging Atlantis mythology, to make it a MacGyver adventure. Mac and Atticus move on to a war-torn region of the Balkan peninsula, which was then wracked by a series of post-Soviet conflicts. It’s tricky to set your adventure story in the middle of a real war that’s still in progress. But the sequence pulls it off by making the war a feature of, rather than backdrop to, the action, and also making a strong moral statement.

This dialogue exchange between MacGyver and the genocidal Col. Petrovic made a particular impression on me, then and now:

Petrovic: “Then you will know that this region belongs to my people and we will take it.”

MacGyver: “Even if it means killing innocent people who happen to live here.”

Petrovic: “We must cleanse the area.”

MacGyver: “You’re talking ethnic cleansing. That’s racial genocide. Look, pal, the whole world has been watching what’s been going on around here. Now you can call it whatever you want, but it’s murder, pure and simple.”

At the age of four, this taught me an important lesson: war is murder, no matter what terms you use to cloak that reality. Watching it today, it came off as ballsy. At the time, making a statement against genocide without mentioning any specific ethnic groups was almost anodyne. But today, the moral clarity is refreshing.

And Mac gets to strike back in a series of highly satisfying action scenes, simultaneously escaping via rocket-propelled car and blowing up an ammo cache to deal a setback to Petrovic. The whole sequence is terrific action-adventure, featuring some classic MacGyver “tricks.” The fluid, precise directing comes courtesy of Mike Vejar: a talented, versatile journeyman with a 25-year career in TV directing. Vejar also directed 14 episodes of Babylon 5 and 32 episodes of the various Star Trek series. For both franchises, his visual flair and panache made him a top choice for many of the important “story arc” episodes, like Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’s concluding arc. He makes you want to cheer at Mac and Atticus’ explosive jailbreak.

The supporting characters generally fit into stock adventure-genre types: the sidekick (Atticus), the romantic interest, the villain, the henchman. But they’re played entertainingly. I appreciate the subtlety of MacGyver’s romance with academic archaeologist Kelly. Not every adventure tale needs a clichéd romance; it’s enough for this one to play out quietly in the background, with allusions to her crush on him five years prior, and a quick kiss at the end.

Brian Blessed as Atticus gives 110% in every scene: on the verge of being annoying, even maniacal, but personally, I find his over-the-top performance endearing. Incidentally, there are three actors in the film that also appear in Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace: Blessed, Hugh Quarshie, and Oliver Ford Davies. Was George Lucas a secret MacGyver-head? (Mac-Daddy?) Did he geek out over this film and think to himself, “That professor guy was great! He’s just perfect for my bloated CGI fish creature!”

Oh yeah, now I see it.

On the production side, the movie is top-notch for its era. Ken Harrison, one of the TV show’s regular composers, delivers a wonderful score full of thematic motifs, including a soaring theme for Atlantis and a driving “MacGyver action theme” whenever our guy starts improvising a “trick.” What takes the cake, though, is the climax in Atlantis’ Temple of Ages. Watching it today, I found it a refreshing throwback to a different era of filmmaking. No digital effects, just a really cool set that adds a sense of solidity to the action. And a tone of pure, earnest wonder with no meta jokes, no ironic quips. It’s still thrilling to watch the gang discover the pumice-entombed body of Solon, the ancient Atlantean computer, and of course, the treasure.

Our villain, Asshole Rich Guy Cleve, opens a treasure chest to find… just a bunch of crumbling scrolls. MacGyver figures it out: “The treasure of Atlantis is knowledge.”

Laura and I agree that this was our big takeaway from the movie, at the ages of two and four respectively. However cheesy and earnest it may sound, it’s such an important message for young minds. Knowledge is wealth. Not gold or jewels. Laura and I have both been avid readers all our lives. And though we would’ve been readers without MacGyver’s encouragement, it certainly helped to know that every time we picked up a book, we were holding the real treasure of civilization.

The film’s ending is 90s optimism personified. Atticus quizzes a group of schoolchildren on what lessons we can learn from Atlantis, and the kids shout out:

“They created democracy! They abolished slavery! There were no executions! Men and women were treated as equals! They believed in peace, not war!”

Art reflects the values of the times. The 90s, and really, the whole era between the fall of the Soviet Union and 9/11, were a high water-mark for democracy and international cooperation. I found it almost moving to hear the movie so earnestly announce its values. It’s a bit cloying, yes, but it’s a message in a bottle from a different time: a sincere faith that we can make the world better.

I, of course, was shaped by my times, and I’ll be a 90s kid forever. To me, that means an innate optimism, and a faith in democracy and humanist values like tolerance and multiculturalism. I remember when America worked, and believe it can work again. In an age of rising authoritarianism, climate disasters, and techno-fascism, the memory of that pre-9/11 world is what I hold onto.

MacGyver: Lost Treasure of Atlantis isn’t perfect, of course. Some of the plotting is unconvincing, especially Atticus’ abrupt betrayal of MacGyver and Kelly, then his switch back to their side mere minutes later. But it’s a solid adventure yarn, one dash Indiana Jones, one dash National Treasure, all MacGyver-style problem-solving. I saw many episodes of the TV show later in life, but this is the tale that cemented MacGyver in my mind, because I saw it first.

MacGyver is embedded so deeply in my approach to problem-solving that he can inspire me at the most unlikely moments. It was 6th grade Outdoor Ed, in a spacious wooden cabin in the Rocky Mountains with bunk beds lined up, barracks-style. I was being a mouthy smartass as usual, this time to a beefy kid who was stalking around pretending like he was boss of the cabin. The kid death-gripped my arm, dragged me to a locker, tossed me inside, and locked it. It was the one and only time that a bully actually shoved me in a locker.

But I wasn’t intimidated, just miffed. My first thought: “What would MacGyver do?” I scoured the wooden cabinet for solutions. The lock was primitive: a short metal rod that you spun from the outside, vertical to open the door, horizontal to lock it, with a latch on the outside that kept me from just shoving the door open. But I had a Mac-style brainwave. I found a coat hanger, swept it through the gap between the door and doorframe to turn the rod, and sprang out. (Mac uses the same trick in the opening minutes of “The Gauntlet.”)

The beefy kid was astonished: “How the fuck did you do that?” I demonstrated my coat hanger technique, and before I knew it, the bully was asking me to push him into the locker so he could try it out. And then every other boy in the cabin wanted to try it too. It became the trendy activity of the day. I had never felt so clever and cool in my life.

Thanks, Mac, I thought.

Movie Memories #1: Fantasia

An ongoing series of tributes to movies that inspire me. First up: the 1940 masterpiece that invented a whole new way of marrying images to sound.

Some experiences are buried so deep in your memory that they’re almost like dreams. They blur into colors and motion and bits of music. They hover in your subconscious, influencing the way you perceive the world, occasionally poking out to flash across your mind in one beautiful, brilliant impression. So it is with Fantasia, one of the first movies I ever remember seeing.

My sister Laura and I were raised on the Disney classics. Our VHS library was stocked with the old warhorses: Snow White, Pinocchio, Dumbo, Bambi, etc. But we also had the good fortune to be born in 1990 (me) and 1991 (Laura), just as the Disney renaissance was taking off, so my childhood was packed to the brim with Disney classics. Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin, The Lion King: these movies forever set my benchmark for animated excellence.

But it’s Fantasia that I actually remember watching, in the living room of our house in North Spokane, Washington. The short gray carpet, the blue foam couch, the wooden cabinets as tall as me, and the square TV perched on the corner of the shelf that sang a high-pitched keening tone whenever you turned it on: this is where I played and dreamed as a kid. And where I sat mesmerized as the images and music of Fantasia danced across the screen, fascinated by the way they intertwined and spoke together.

Throughout the 1920s and 30s, Disney and his animators had been perfecting the art of the animated short, including in the Silly Symphony series of cartoons set to music. Fantasia, released in 1940, was both a natural evolution and a quantum leap forward for the art of animation, a feature-length series of animated sequences set to classical music. This was a revolutionary way to combine images and sound, planting the seeds for the development of the music video decades later.

At the age of four, I was on board with the concept from the narrator’s introduction. I understood that I was about to see images that might appear in your head as you listen to music. Sometimes, the piece of music would tell a story, so the images would tell a story. Sometimes, the piece of music would be abstract, “music for its own sake,” so the images would also be abstract, like in the first sequence, Toccata and Fugue in D Minor.

Magnificent.

I’m not synesthetic; I don’t see colors when I hear musical notes. But Fantasia, especially this first sequence, was a quasi-synesthetic experience, as I instinctively accepted that certain images and sounds just went together. A musical phrase of burbling oboes was also a shadow rolling across a hill, and it just made sense. Bright, ethereal, chugging violins were also columns of clouds thrusting majestically into the sky. Fantasia is not necessarily a movie that holds a kid’s attention, but during this sequence, I was glued to the screen, floating in a glittering palace of sense impressions.

The first half of the movie has a dreamlike quality perfectly suited to the gauzy haze of early childhood. Once you’re past the pure abstraction of Toccata and Fugue, there’s the imaginative multicolored parade of The Nutcracker Suite. My and Laura’s favorite parts were the Chinese and Russian dances. The high energy of the Russian dance always got us to jump to our feet and shake our wiggles out, the way only two- and four-year-olds can.

Then there’s the dark whimsy of The Sorcerer’s Apprentice, the first sequence that tells a definite story. Audience identification is a tricky thing. When we watch a movie and really get involved in it and feel what the characters are feeling, are we still just watching or does part of us believe we are those characters? I guess it depends on how deeply you’re willing to invest in the dream. What I know is that Mickey Mouse in The Sorcerer’s Apprentice, along with Pinocchio in Pinocchio, were some of the first characters I identified with, whatever that means to a kid. (It helped that Mickey’s robes were red, my favorite color!) One of my most beloved childhood toys was Mickey in his sorcerer’s robes.

The Sorcerer’s Apprentice is easy for a kid to connect to: the drudgery of doing chores and cleaning up (Mickey having to haul buckets of water), the excitement of trying something dangerous while the adult’s away (Mickey animating the broomsticks to do his work for him), the horror of creating a big mess and knowing you’ll get in big trouble when Dad / Mom / the sorcerer gets home. All this is why The Sorcerer’s Apprentice was my favorite sequence, the one I wanted to watch over and over and over. It still conjures feelings of awe and trepidation at the crashing waves and armies of marching broomsticks.

The stuff that dreams are made of.

And that’s as far as we got. The Rite of Spring was the big barrier for me and Laura. As soon as the volcanoes started erupting, we were out: too scary. It wasn’t until sometime in my teen years that it actually occurred to me: I need to finish this movie. Even watching it while older, I was still staggered by the weight of it.

And as a teen, I could appreciate how bold The Rite of Spring was in 1940: just 15 years after the Scopes Monkey Trial, as the narrator puts it, “a coldly accurate reproduction” of the scientific tale of the formation of life on Earth. I found it quaint and charming how the narrator had to explain what dinosaurs were to the audience, and how we didn’t know about the asteroid yet, so the sequence went with the theory that “great droughts and earthquakes turned the whole world into a gigantic Dust Bowl.” The Rite of Spring is phenomenal cinema: the dark, cosmic loneliness of planets and galaxies, the brutality of magma oozing and mountains crumbling, the primitive spectacle of dinosaurs fighting, then the sad horror as they wander in the desert to die. It’s really not meant for kids.

Powerful, tragic, eerie: not exactly kid-friendly.

Night on Bald Mountain / Ave Maria is also stunning, a juxtaposition of two compositions, the first demonic, the second angelic, that represent, as the narrator explains, “the triumph of hope and life over the powers of despair and death.” Bald Mountain presents the sinister spectacle of a looming devil and cavorting demons menacing a European-style town, while Ave Maria concludes the film with an ending sequence of mysterious beauty. It can still bring tears to my eyes: the parade of pilgrims, each with a bobbing lantern, through a washed-out, misty landscape of fog, the stillness, the serenity.

Finally seeing the full splendor of Fantasia, I was knocked out by its artistry and ambition. What other movie (besides maybe The Tree of Life), tries to tell the entire history of life of Earth and the story of the ultimate triumph of good over evil purely through images in just two hours?

Fantasia has been a personal touchstone for my entire life, igniting my appreciation for the way that music and images go together. When, as an adult, I got my first job that paid well enough so that I had some spending money left over, I allowed myself to buy one “luxury item” per week: a book, a CD, a movie on Blu-Ray. What was the very first movie I bought? You guessed it.

Fantasia is a magnificent work, the one brief moment when this greatest of popular filmmakers intersected with high art. It was to be a short-lived moment; the film was a financial failure due to the outbreak of World War II cutting off access to European film markets. During the war, the struggling Disney company was forced to pivot towards shorter features (Dumbo is only 64 minutes) and propaganda cartoons. Fantasia, then, represents a singular moment in the history of the Disney company and film history, when the man who brought the world Mickey Mouse and Disneyland tried to get you to sit down, listen to classical music, and let images carry you into a palace of imagination.